• Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Similar vibe, but I think ‘marxism’ is not the only conclusion from realising how much megacorps control our world. I’m more of a left-anarchist myself :U

      • there1snospoon@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        As a leftist/liberal who doesn’t know too much about polsci, how would anarchism function on a grand scale? Genuine curiosity.

        • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Anarchism is less a system of functions to be implemented, and more of a governing philosophy on how we build other systems. That philosophy focuses heavily on the expansion of democracy and the elimination of hierarchy wherever possible in order to create the most total freedom in the system. It is not inherently opposed to the concepts of governance or laws as many believe. It usually means focusing on smaller governing units, preferring local governance wherever possible, to give people the most direct control over their own lives. Self-sufficient communities are a major goal here.

          The meaning of freedom to an anarchist is wholistic; not just freedom to, but also freedom from. Freedom to pursue your life on your terms, freedom from any obligation or inhibition that would prevent or detract from that goal. This includes, for example, unconditional freedom for all people from starvation, homelessness, or the inability to access medical care. It is an intentionally utopian ideal, that we should strive for something that may not even be possible, because that is how we’ll create the best possible world.

          Once upon a time, anarchism was effectively synonymous with libertarianism. That word was bastardized in America to the point that it is unrecognizable now.

          • there1snospoon@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Well. That’s a wholly different picture than the word itself paints.

            It’s almost sad, as anarchist has such a negative connotation that, to me, it feels what you’re describing may deserve a new name to relieve it of the baggage associated with the name. It will be awfully hard to get people to listen in America when it’s so saturated with the idea that anarchism is, well… anarchic, ungoverned chaos.

          • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            My brother lent me “The History of Everything” and it’s appealing, but in the end i couldn’t go along with it because a) it billed itself as an academic work but was a polemic and b) the privilege of the authors screamed across every page, as much as they stated that they weren’t.

            IMO, anarchism fails to confront the fact that there are malignant psychopathic in the world. As much as they claim not to fall into the Noble Savage trap, that was the essence of the book.

            There will always be exploitative people, and assuming that a Return to Nature (regardless of the many other benefits to sustainability that I in no way want to impugn) will eliminate that is, in my view, somewhat naive.

  • Ketchup@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s crazy to me that at this point. I feel like purchasing an app for $79.00 for a lifetime license feels emotionally like a FOSS. It’s “free after a one time fee” - that marketing could practically work on me at this point. But since lifetime licenses are disappearing left and right, FOSS is the only future for continued development

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      To be honest.

      Samesies.

      I was happy to buy (the very proprietary, very commercial) Magix Vegas. Why?

      Because gasp. It had an option where I paid them money and I just. Had the application. No yearly subscription, no log in every time I turn on the programme.

      Just. A one-time activation. Holy shit. I use it for my work and woooooowww.

      Even though it can’t use my AMD GPU properly.

  • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m trying to remember what my gateway drug into FOSS was. VLC is a strong contender, but it might’ve been OpenOffice for me

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Mine was Inkscape, back in the early days of the MLP fandom, when I learned I could make show-accurate art using this entirely free computer program. Which lead to using it to make like, memes and shitposts and stuff for fandom shit.

      Like I’d used free software before – But seeing Inkscape in action and then, a year later, getting into college for design-related stuff and learning that people used Adobe Illustrator (which costs a fortune) for the same things was my ‘oh cool, my free thing can do most if not all the stuff this expensive tool can’

      From then on there was no going back.

    • macallik@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Redirector did it for me. The I found out about libredirect and started using alternative front ends for everything. from there I switched over to Linux and that’s all she wrote

    • nottheengineer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Mine was Windows. It became so bad I decided to say “fuck it, linux might be hard but anything is better than this bullshit”.

      Now I know that windows isn’t just a bad implementation of an OS, it’s fundamentally a bad concept. If you can even call that mess a concept.