• aksdb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      it doesn’t matter

      Hehe.

      Anyway, I am also completely on Zigbee. While I like the concept of Matter over Thread, I wouldn’t want to switch, because it will start with a too small network to cover a good distance and if I start replacing Zigbee devices, I effectively sabotage that network as well. So my only move would be to replace all Zigbee with Matter/Thread devices. And that seems insane. So I hope I keep getting new Zigbee devices for a while.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t see why you can’t keep your Zigbee network and start up a new Thread/Matter one. They should be fine to work together! Your Zigbee stuff will work in 20 years, besides component failure.

        • Mark Gjøl@mstdn.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          @bdonvr @aksdb One zigbee device replaced by a thread device means that one node is removed from the zigbee network, making it smaller. Since it’s a mesh network it will become less robust as a result. Likewise, the initial thread network will be very sparsely populated until a sufficient amount of devices has been added to it.

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That’s fair, though you could leave a zigbee router plugged in to bridge things even if you don’t really need the device for example a smart plug.

            The other disadvantage is that for a zigbee device to control a matter device it will have to route through your home assistant/smart home hub instead of being able to pair a switch directly to lights for example with zigbee.