You really only need Storage. Backblaze B2/Wasabi/Cloudflare R2 if you can afford it, or just get a Hetzner storage box, attach it to the VM, run Minio and off you go.

Configure the TOR Duckduckgo and Brave search engines and only search over TOR. Switch circuits every x hours.

You should do it on a VPS so that even if it gets infected your home network is not compromised

I’m afraid I do not follow. TrueNAS scale has support for kubernetes: install containers on top, maybe different containers for different fileshares/uses (one container for VM images, one for media etc).

Mount said network volumes on the compute boxes.

Use something that can do TCP, i.e. HAProxy, NGINX or Apache

Support Mullvad.

You should have bought the framework after they put more effort into Coreboot.

Pine64 and Fairphone are good companies too

Just let her have Gmail if she is willing to divorce you over windows and email (what a handful you’ve caught there lad)

Just run KODI from anywhere

If you can only use port 22 for multiple SSH endpoints (for example), then yes your going to need multiple IPs. Or Port-mapping as a compromise

In short, you need a reverse-proxy + traffic segregation with domain names (SNI).

I don’t remember much about ingresses, but this can be super easy to set up with Gateway API (I’m looking at it right now).

Basically, you can set up sftp.my.domain/ssh to 192.168.1.40:22, sftp.my.domain/sftp to 192.168.1.40:121 (for example). Same with Forgejo, forgejo.my.domain/ssh will point to 192.168.1.50:22 and forgejo.my.domain/gui will point to 192.168.1.50:443.

The Gateway API will simply send it over to the right k8s service.

About your home network: I think you could in theory open up a DMZ and everything should work. I would personally use a cheap VPS as a VPN server and NAT all traffic through it. About traffic from your router maintaining the SNI, that’s a different problem depending on your network setup. Yes, you’ll have to deal with port-mapping because at the end of the day, even Gateway API is NodePort-esque when exposing traffic outside.

You’d receive traffic on IP:PORT, that’s segregation right there. Slap on a DNS name for convenience.

I might have my MetalLB config lying around somewhere (it’s super easy, I copied most of it from their website), I can probably paste it here if you’d like.

Exposing services publicly on the Internet is a L3-L4/L7 networking problem, unfortunately I don’t know enough about your situation to comment.

Edit: the latter end of your post is correct. You could route to different end-points that way

Ingress controllers like Traefik come across as LB services to IPAM modules like MetalLB (I’ve never used Kube-VIP but I suppose it’s the same story). These plug-ins assign IP addresses to these LB services.

You can assign a specific IP to an instance of an “outward-facing route” with labels. I don’t remember technical terms relevant to Ingresses because I’ve been messing with the Gateway API recently.

MetalLB + map new external IP to sub-domain == profit.

Read some of the other comments: it’s not about your control plane. All you need is multiple external IPs which an IPAM module/plug-in can provide (MetalLB, Cilium and maybe Kube-VIP: I’ve never used it).

SMR vs CMR and drive speeds

I need to try this, thanks

Setting SELinux to permissive is not a good security practice

Why not port knocking over TOR?

Well the Star64 from Pine is pretty good, just doesn’t have enough processing power and IO for my liking.

Framework has a laptop in progress if you’re interested

Yeah that’s your situation. Some people are fine with it