No wonder she’s so boring. She may have all the talent in the world, but she’s a prime example of a wrestler needing to be in the WWE machine to be truly successful.
No wonder she’s so boring. She may have all the talent in the world, but she’s a prime example of a wrestler needing to be in the WWE machine to be truly successful.
Someone better have called a lawyer to sue that security company.
I imagine this would be up to the application. What you’re describing would been seen by the OS as the device becoming unavailable. That won’t really affect the OS. But, it could cause problems with the drivers and/or applications that are expecting the device to be available. The effect could range from “hm, the GPU isn’t responding, oh well” to a kernel panic.
Curious how this is distinct from SimpleX.
Boy, I am out of the loop. When did Mox take the IWGP title?!
He’s not wrong. Injured/Absent Punk is the best Punk.
I don’t get it
She’s soooo WWE-bound.
All these guys look better as normal people. This guy could own any room he enters.
I still use the label ‘homelab’ for everything in my house, including the production services. It’s just a convenient term and not something I’ve seen anyone split hairs about until now.
if nothing on it is permanent. You can have a home lab where the things you’re testing are self hosted apps. But if the server in question is meant to be permanent, like if you’re backing up the data on it, or you’ve got it on a UPS you make sure it stays available, or you would be upset if somebody came by and accidentally unplugged it during the day, it’s not a home lab.
A home lab is an unimportant, transient environment me
Well, that certainly happened.
Why does it seem like WWE is always copying-parodying fsociety ?
Tailscale is an overlay network. It will use whatever networking is available. If only one of those NICs is a gateway, then that’s what will be used to reach remote Tailnet resources.
Leaving this post here since it’s an interesting project to keep an eye on, but the conversation isn’t constructive. So, locking the comments.
Would they have to be VLAN aware if the switch port was already tagged AND if OP doesn’t care to consider untagged traffic ?
With the disclaimer that Proxmox has nothing to do with this question, I’m forced to assume this is just a networking issue that happens to use OPNsense as the router. Because of that, I must advise that you seek help from a networking-focused community. There’s no clear link to self-hosting in this post, which is required per Rule 3.
If the connections are already tagged as you come into the Proxmox server, then you need only to create interfaces for them in Proxmox (vmbr1, vmbr2, etc). EDIT: if you’re doing PCI passthrough of the physical NICs, ignore this step.
Then, in OPNsense, you just adding the individual interfaces. No need to assign a VLAN inside OPnsense because the traffic is already tagged on the network (per your earlier statement).
Whether or not the managed switch that has tagged each port is also providing VLAN isolation, you’ll simply use the OPNsense firewall to provide isolation, which it does by default. You’ll use it to allow the connections access to the fiber WAN gateway.
Man. What a yawn…
Is it just me, or do these multi-night events end up watering down the card? WM40 was fairly lackluster aside from the top of the card. Now we’re going to do it with SummerSlam? Maybe HHH will keep each night’s card small, like 4 matches, and that would avoid the fluff.
IMO, this is a discussion that should be taking place on the project’s GitHub. I’m going to lock the comments so I don’t get any more reports about commenters’ behavior.