lmao you joke but half this thread is exactly that opinion
lmao you joke but half this thread is exactly that opinion
finally, somebody in this thread who doesn’t live in the past.
System package manager is for system binaries. Not for applications.
sounds like a modern approach
IMO flatpaks are the future of installing linux apps. The comment you replied to lives in the past. System package manager should be for system binaries, not for applications.
Atomic distro users: Look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power!
I’ve had most stuff look good with Plasma 6. But not perfect.
yeah that’s why the term “atomic” is better
good point, that’s fair. The reason I think it bears mentioning is that editing configs under /etc/ is totally something we might expect a user to do. So you could follow a tutorial online that is wrong or outdated and with enough bad luck, tada, you bricked your “immutable” system. Or, less dramatic and more likely, something doesn’t work as intended anymore and you don’t know how to restore to the original config from when you installed.
I’m no expert on this but I’m pretty sure the /etc directory is writeable too for config files, which sadly still allows a user or malware to still bork the system if they get superuser privilege
You could contribute to Pinta, which I’m pretty sure has the same vision
I’m not used to photoshop so I can’t say anything about that.
I was a big fan of paint.NET but now that I stopped using Windows, it’s the only software that I really miss.
It had fewer features than GIMP, but it was so intuitive yet surprisingly powerful.
Have not found a similarly amazing alrernative, I wish Wine could make it work…
It’s that phenomenon where people who endured trauma to attain something expect others to also endure the trauma.
I’ve tried learning GIMP, and it sucks. I’m not saying GIMP sucks, but you have to be crazy to not see that it’s hard to learn.
I think that’s the Wayland logo
I think many of these jokes are made by linux fans to make fun of ourselves lol
context?
thus made 0 sense sorry :P
I think WSL was Microsofts way of trying to get developers to keep using Windows.
nope. it’s just a fancy word for a linux VM running on windows with special integrations like full file system access etc.
it’s mainly used by developers who need to use windows for work but want a linux filesystem and command line for development. integrates well eith VSCode.
you are a real linux user don’t let some neckbeard tell you otherwise :P