Bleeding edge? Isn’t that just called stable?

It’s not even a single binary blob. Shows your competence around this topic. Feel free to continue rambling and whatever without knowing anything about it.

And what knowledge makes that opinion have any factual value?

You don’t know the details of why it was chosen, yet you complain about people with obviously more knowledge on these topics having chosen it… reminds me of science deniers.

And what concerns did/do you exactly have? Did you as a “democratic” user make yourself loud instead of crying about “corruption” on lemmy?

The choice of making way more things than just the job of an init system harder than it has to be, especially when both flavors have to work. Feel free to call generous people who work for the community “assholes”, but it’s you who’s that, if anyone

It’s not just an init system. Look up what it does and why it exists, instead of blindly hating some software for some obsessive reason.

Plus, do rust coreutils do anything exceptionally better than GNU coreutils? If not, I don’t think many would switch

time to snapshot my latest snapshot

(btrfs)

While that works, it sometimes might break things: https://fedoramagazine.org/offline-updates-and-fedora-35/

ha I already am (Android)

!i actually daily-drive fedora on my laptop!<

More like having Microsoft and Windows live rent-free in their head competition

I bet it also cost a ton as well lol. Well I’m jealous now.

What 4 year old laptop can handle that much RAM?

something something ostree and how complicated the stuff it does actually is

You think compiling a binary with a different toolchain and system paths is the same as exploiting a made up security vulnerability linked to a game for some reason. I’m done wasting my time here. /system/bin/uname -s prints Linux, that’s enough.

Yeah but for e.g. the notification and quick panel, you need to modify the System UI app. It’s like everything below the top panel in GNOME is replaceable lol

Like ability to install different desktop enviroment?

Technically, with root access, yeah. It’s just that Android’s UI isn’t a DE/WM in the desktop Linux sense

Almost all apps store settings in easy to backup .config folder.

And same for Android app data with root access. /data contains, well, data of apps and the general system. Sure, it’s not the same as on desktop Linux, but it’s still possible to modify, copy, delete with root access. Every app is a different Linux user on Android, and that’s also just different from desktop Linux.

To me, you’re just pointing out differences due to the software architecture of both OSes.

Setting up an ad blocker for a whole device often requires root

Private DNS since Android 9 can do that without root access afaik, like with AdGuard’s public service

Try to use apt on Android

With Termux one can

And no ads in every app.

Don’t use apps with ads then? Or set up an ad blocker.

Root access, that is, being admim of your own device.

That’s just how most Android versions are shipped. It’s still technically possible to get root access, and really enjoy every privilege of Linux. Not all devices allow using a custom OS though, sadly