Recently I have decided that the backup solution I have been using is far too complex for my family to figure out when I die. I began writing documentation on how they can access photos, videos, documents and so on. In that process I thought, I gotta make this simple.

I’m thinking of just having two 10TB drives in RAID 1 on my desktop that get backed up to Backblaze via restic. Backblaze and similar cloud storage providers can send you a copy of your data for recovery. I think I can sufficiently document this process.

Has anyone else come up with a similar process?

  • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    From a security perspective, it isn’t ideal, but a simple unencrypted external drive might be the best solution.

  • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    You know how you need to test any backup solution? This is the same. Have anyone that you’re expecting to do this run through the process entirely from your documentation. If they can’t, adjust the doc/process until they can. Then include that with your will, or with other documents people will be looking through in the event of your death.

  • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t self host to the extent many here seem too but I have had the same thought and joked with my wife about it.

    Ultimately everything I’ve setup I’ve done in part because it’s my hobby and it interests me. When I’m gone my family will revert to whatever they’d normally be doing without me, because they don’t have interest in it like I do.

  • a1studmuffin 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Slight tangent, but I recently cleaned out the house of a parent after they passed away. There were boxes and boxes of family photo albums. We kept them for a while out of guilt, but we really didn’t know anyone in the photos aside from one or two people. Eventually we got rid of them. Point being the value of your stuff is probably far less to others then it is to you, especially photos to future generations.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is a nice theory, but remember people don’t always die in order. If you pass away before your parents, they will almost certainly appreciate your photos. If you die before your spouse, they will need access to documents and will appreciate photos as well.

      In a “hit by a bus” scenario, you don’t get a chance to migrate things away from your self-hosted solution, and those you leave behind most likely are not exclusively “future gemerations”.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Label those pictures though, they are more useful. When my grandma died we showed her old photos to a man who looked at one and said, that is my mom, I never saw a.picture of mom before she was married before. However if my grandma hadn’t labeled the pictures it would be some girl nobody knew 70 years later ’

  • DLSantini@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I want the opposite. I want all of my data to be completely inaccessible to anyone, and potentially even self-destruct somehow.

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    this is a great untapped business idea. people need an idiot proof but safe and yet a succession/trust plan. i struggle with phone backups too.