These are some quick n’ dirty instructions so people can get up and running fast.

I wish I had known this was possible sooner.

Instructions:

Check that your VPN supports port forwarding and you have it enabled.

Grab your VPN’s internal IP with ip a

Find the interface for your VPN. For me it’s called tun0.

Open up /etc/nginx/nginx.conf

You can back it up, or comment everything out, or pick what’s necessary. Here’s what my file looks like.

	worker_processes  1;
	include modules.d/*.conf;

	events {
		worker_connections  1024;
	}
	http {
		server {
			listen [VPN INTERNAL IP]:[VPN FORWARDED PORT];
			server_name  localhost;
			location / {
				root '[ABSOLUTE PATH TO YOUR WEBSITE ROOT FOLDER]';
				index index.html; # Relative to your website root.
			}
		}
	}

Make sure your permissions are correct. For me, the ‘other’ group needs read permissions to the root folder, including where it’s mounted.

Start nginx with systemctl start nginx

You can visit your website on your host machine in a browser at [VPN INTERNAL IP]:[VPN FORWADED PORT]. For me, using the internal IP is required to view the website on my host machine.

To view the website on other machines, you can use [VPN EXTERNAL IP]:[VPN FORWARDED PORT]. The only thing you need to change is the IP address.

I hope this works for you and you are inspired to selfhost and take back power from those who stole it from us.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    You you setup a proper domain and https for your website instead of having a random IP address and port. Don’t visit http pages in 2025. It is a major security risk.

    Edit: If you need help setting up https let me know. You will need a domain but they are fairly inexpensive. If it is a matter of technical knowledge let me know as I can help.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        How so?

        Data send back isn’t validated so someone could tamper with the data. A bad actor could add some arbittary Javascript plus ISPs have been caught inserting marketing materials into pages.

        From a privacy perspective it is also bad as not only does it include your user agent in plain text it doesn’t have any encryption on page contents which allows your ISP to snoop on what you are doing.

        All of these reasons are while we moved to https. X.509 certs are free and trivial to setup with Caddy or any other Reverse proxy/web server. If https was crazy had to setup I’d be more understanding but it is very easy to do in 2025.

        • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          Do you really think someone is going to set up a MITM attack for the dozen people who visit this blog?

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            18 days ago

            No, but governments and ISPs can and have historically done so for all http traffic.

            It doesn’t matter the page. They just care about http.

            • missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              specifically this is how QUANTUMINSERT worked (from the Snowden leaks.) also China used the same technique, injecting malicious JS through the GFW to get bystanders to DDoS github, in a much more obvious and indiscriminate way.

              nobody here is remotely likely to be targeted by NSA, of course, but you can actually do such attacks on a budget if you compromise any router in the chain. combined with a BGP hijack it’s not far out of reach for even a ransomware gang to pull something like that these days.

              • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                18 days ago

                To add to this, a whole lot of places have been compromised in the salt typhoon attacks. China has compromised infrastructure all over the place including ISP hardware.

      • jafra@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        18 days ago

        Maybe there is, maybe it’s only little. Maybe people browsing should be more aware of where they click on. Either way, this method shouldn’t be used for any sensitive information least a personal cloud. Would be suicidal I guess.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        19 days ago

        I’ll bite.

        The risk is training people in bad behaviors, and then having those people do stupid things like type in a password.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          There’s no password entry on this site, and what people do on other websites is not OPs responsibility.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            19 days ago

            Oh yes. Pushing personal responsibility to the end user has always been a very effective security strategy.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Lmao as the operator of a website your personal responsibility ends with your website. It is not OPs responsibility to protect other websites he does not operate, nor is it to take on the end user’s responsibility, or education. Don’t be silly.

              • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                19 days ago

                Of course it does. You’re only ever responsible for yourself.

                And that mentality does not lead to good things.

                • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  18 days ago

                  Of course it does, could you imagine the alternative? Imagine spontaneously taking responsibility for the safety of the entire internet. That would be just nuts.

                  I can heartily recommend taking responsibility for yourself, and not trying to foist it on others. Especially some dude with a rinky dink little personal blog.

                  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    18 days ago

                    This is a definition problem I think. I don’t use the word “responsible” to mean sole ownership. For example. We are all responsible for the cleanliness of our roads. It is a shared responsibility that we all participate in.

                    And, I think, we are all responsible for modeling good behaviors for people to emulate.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 days ago

      LOL. On the scale of risky things I’ve done today, visiting this guy’s http website barely rates a mention.

      Someone posts about something they’ve learned and the best you can do is dump on them about whatever thing in order to demonstrate to everyone your superior knowledge.

      Everyone starts somewhere.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        I’m down to help people get https set up. I’m not trying to dunk but rather I’m trying to make the internet a safer place by reducing attacks and mass surveillance.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        19 days ago

        Let’s be real, this guy has no knowledge. He’s just yet another security parrot who doesn’t even understand the why behind the things they’re regurgitating.

    • rarsamx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      All those “experts” lecturing you and they don’t even know about man in the middle attacks.

      They don’t know that there are active bots searching for HTTP addresses to inject risky code or redirect to malicious sites.

      You providing some feedback which may help OP is seen as criticism.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        They don’t know that there are active bots searching for HTTP addresses to inject risky code or redirect to malicious sites.

        I’m going to be honest I have no idea what you are talking about.