• bestusername@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I jumped on the NAS bandwagon about 10yrs ago and it really didn’t take that long before I’d reached the limits of the CPU and RAM.

    Last year I built an i5 system to replace it and it’s just better. Hardware and softwareb updates are just easier with a desktop. I can run my web server, torrent VM, DB, Plex and file sharing with resources to spare.

    If you simply want a device to store/share files, get a NAS, but the second you want to do anything more, build a basic desktop.

    Oh and it’s cheaper!

    • Pringles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just use an HP Microserver gen 8 with upgraded cpu and ram. But yea, just a relatively cheap computer is all 98% of the people really need, as long as you can configure enough disks. NAS’es are way overpriced with shitty hardware.

      • Scrath@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends I guess. For me the biggest concern when I bought my Synology was simplicity of usage and idle power consumption which is much lower than I could get with one of the older computers I have lying around.