0x4E4F@infosec.pub to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pubimagemessage-square239fedilinkarrow-up11.31Karrow-down135
arrow-up11.28Karrow-down1imageSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pub0x4E4F@infosec.pub to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square239fedilink
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up25·11 months agoAnarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
minus-squareaksdb@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·11 months agoSo we could use a blockchain… (/s)
minus-squaremcmoor@bookwormstory.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·11 months agoBut then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·11 months agoWhich is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.
Anarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
Basicaly democracy on steroids
So we could use a blockchain… (/s)
But then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
You can have a majority vote system.
Which is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.